Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 159 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 45 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 100 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 175 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 452 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 34 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Improved unsupervised physics-informed deep learning for intravoxel incoherent motion modeling and evaluation in pancreatic cancer patients (2011.01689v2)

Published 3 Nov 2020 in physics.med-ph, cs.LG, and q-bio.QM

Abstract: ${\bf Purpose}$: Earlier work showed that IVIM-NET${orig}$, an unsupervised physics-informed deep neural network, was more accurate than other state-of-the-art intravoxel-incoherent motion (IVIM) fitting approaches to DWI. This study presents an improved version: IVIM-NET${optim}$, and characterizes its superior performance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. ${\bf Method}$: In simulations (SNR=20), the accuracy, independence and consistency of IVIM-NET were evaluated for combinations of hyperparameters (fit S0, constraints, network architecture, # hidden layers, dropout, batch normalization, learning rate), by calculating the NRMSE, Spearman's $\rho$, and the coefficient of variation (CV${NET}$), respectively. The best performing network, IVIM-NET${optim}$ was compared to least squares (LS) and a Bayesian approach at different SNRs. IVIM-NET${optim}$'s performance was evaluated in 23 PDAC patients. 14 of the patients received no treatment between scan sessions and 9 received chemoradiotherapy between sessions. Intersession within-subject standard deviations (wSD) and treatment-induced changes were assessed. ${\bf Results}$: In simulations, IVIM-NET${optim}$ outperformed IVIM-NET${orig}$ in accuracy (NRMSE(D)=0.18 vs 0.20; NMRSE(f)=0.22 vs 0.27; NMRSE(D*)=0.39 vs 0.39), independence ($\rho$(D*,f)=0.22 vs 0.74) and consistency (CV${NET}$ (D)=0.01 vs 0.10; CV${NET}$ (f)=0.02 vs 0.05; CV${NET}$ (D*)=0.04 vs 0.11). IVIM-NET${optim}$ showed superior performance to the LS and Bayesian approaches at SNRs<50. In vivo, IVIM-NET${optim}$ sshowed significantly less noisy parameter maps with lower wSD for D and f than the alternatives. In the treated cohort, IVIM-NET${optim}$ detected the most individual patients with significant parameter changes compared to day-to-day variations. ${\bf Conclusion}$: IVIM-NET${optim}$ is recommended for IVIM fitting to DWI data.

Citations (68)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube