Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On Properties and Optimization of Information-theoretic Privacy Watchdog

Published 19 Oct 2020 in cs.IT and math.IT | (2010.09367v1)

Abstract: We study the problem of privacy preservation in data sharing, where SS is a sensitive variable to be protected and XX is a non-sensitive useful variable correlated with SS. Variable XX is randomized into variable YY, which will be shared or released according to pY∣X(y∣x)p_{Y|X}(y|x). We measure privacy leakage by \emph{information privacy} (also known as \emph{log-lift} in the literature), which guarantees mutual information privacy and differential privacy (DP). Let $\Xepsc \subseteq \X$ contain elements n the alphabet of XX for which the absolute value of log-lift (abs-log-lift for short) is greater than a desired threshold $\eps$. When elements $x\in \Xepsc$ are randomized into $y\in \Y$, we derive the best upper bound on the abs-log-lift across the resultant pairs (s,y)(s,y). We then prove that this bound is achievable via an \emph{XX-invariant} randomization p(y∣x)=R(y)p(y|x) = R(y) for $x,y\in\Xepsc$. However, the utility measured by the mutual information I(X;Y)I(X;Y) is severely damaged in imposing a strict upper bound $\eps$ on the abs-log-lift. To remedy this and inspired by the probabilistic ($\eps$, δ\delta)-DP, we propose a relaxed ($\eps$, δ\delta)-log-lift framework. To achieve this relaxation, we introduce a greedy algorithm which exempts some elements in $\Xepsc$ from randomization, as long as their abs-log-lift is bounded by $\eps$ with probability 1−δ1-\delta. Numerical results demonstrate efficacy of this algorithm in achieving a better privacy-utility tradeoff.

Citations (13)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.