Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
104 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
12 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
40 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Survey on Numerical Methods for Spectral Space-Fractional Diffusion Problems (2010.02717v1)

Published 3 Oct 2020 in math.NA and cs.NA

Abstract: The survey is devoted to numerical solution of the fractional equation $A\alpha u=f$, $0 < \alpha <1$, where $A$ is a symmetric positive definite operator corresponding to a second order elliptic boundary value problem in a bounded domain $\Omega$ in $\mathbb Rd$. The operator fractional power is a non-local operator and is defined through the spectrum. Due to growing interest and demand in applications of sub-diffusion models to physics and engineering, in the last decade, several numerical approaches have been proposed, studied, and tested. We consider discretizations of the elliptic operator $A$ by using an $N$-dimensional finite element space $V_h$ or finite differences over a uniform mesh with $N$ grid points. The numerical solution of this equation is based on the following three equivalent representations of the solution: (1) Dunford-Taylor integral formula (or its equivalent Balakrishnan formula), (2) extension of the a second order elliptic problem in $\Omega \times (0,\infty)\subset \mathbb R{d+1}$ (with a local operator) or as a pseudo-parabolic equation in the cylinder $(x,t) \in \Omega \times (0,1) $, (3) spectral representation and the best uniform rational approximation (BURA) of $z\alpha$ on $[0,1]$. Though substantially different in origin and their analysis, these methods can be interpreted as some rational approximation of $A{-\alpha}$. In this paper we present the main ideas of these methods and the corresponding algorithms, discuss their accuracy, computational complexity and compare their efficiency and robustness.

Citations (25)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.