Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 62 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 217 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 474 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A Weight-scaling Algorithm for $f$-factors of Multigraphs (2010.01102v1)

Published 2 Oct 2020 in cs.DS

Abstract: We discuss combinatorial algorithms for finding a maximum weight $f$-factor on an arbitrary multigraph, for given integral weights of magnitude at most $W$. For simple bipartite graphs the best-known time bound is $O(n{2/3}\, m\, \log nW)$ (\cite{GT89}; $n$ and $m$ are respectively the number of vertices and edges). A recent algorithm of Duan and He et al. \cite{DHZ} for $f$-factors of simple graphs comes within logarithmic factors of this bound, $\widetilde{O} (n{2/3}\, m\, \log W)$. The best-known bound for bipartite multigraphs is $O(\sqrt {\Phi}\, m\, \log \Phi W)$ ($\Phi\le m$ is the size of the $f$-factor, $\Phi=\sum_{v\in V}f(v)/2$). This bound is more general than the restriction to simple graphs, and is even superior on "small" simple graphs, i.e., $\Phi=o(n{4/3})$. We present an algorithm that comes within a $\sqrt {\log \Phi}$ factor of this bound, i.e., $O(\sqrt {\Phi \log \Phi}\,m \,\log \Phi W)$. The algorithm is a direct generalization of the algorithm of Gabow and Tarjan \cite{GT} for the special case of ordinary matching ($f\equiv 1$). We present our algorithm first for ordinary matching, as the analysis is a simplified version of \cite{GT}. Furthermore the algorithm and analysis both get incorporated without modification into the multigraph algorithm. To extend these ideas to $f$-factors, the first step is "expanding" edges (i.e., replacing an edge by a length 3 alternating path). \cite{DHZ} uses a one-time expansion of the entire graph. Our algorithm keeps the graph small by only expanding selected edges, and "compressing" them back to their original source when no longer needed. Several other ideas are needed, including a relaxation of the notion of "blossom" to e-blossom ("expanded blossom").

Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube