Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 62 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 93 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 213 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 458 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Sampling possible reconstructions of undersampled acquisitions in MR imaging (2010.00042v3)

Published 30 Sep 2020 in eess.IV, cs.CV, cs.LG, and stat.AP

Abstract: Undersampling the k-space during MR acquisitions saves time, however results in an ill-posed inversion problem, leading to an infinite set of images as possible solutions. Traditionally, this is tackled as a reconstruction problem by searching for a single "best" image out of this solution set according to some chosen regularization or prior. This approach, however, misses the possibility of other solutions and hence ignores the uncertainty in the inversion process. In this paper, we propose a method that instead returns multiple images which are possible under the acquisition model and the chosen prior to capture the uncertainty in the inversion process. To this end, we introduce a low dimensional latent space and model the posterior distribution of the latent vectors given the acquisition data in k-space, from which we can sample in the latent space and obtain the corresponding images. We use a variational autoencoder for the latent model and the Metropolis adjusted Langevin algorithm for the sampling. We evaluate our method on two datasets; with images from the Human Connectome Project and in-house measured multi-coil images. We compare to five alternative methods. Results indicate that the proposed method produces images that match the measured k-space data better than the alternatives, while showing realistic structural variability. Furthermore, in contrast to the compared methods, the proposed method yields higher uncertainty in the undersampled phase encoding direction, as expected. Keywords: Magnetic Resonance image reconstruction, uncertainty estimation, inverse problems, sampling, MCMC, deep learning, unsupervised learning.

Citations (5)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube