Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 63 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 100 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 174 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

SCREENet: A Multi-view Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Classification of High-resolution Synthetic Mammographic Screening Scans (2009.08563v3)

Published 18 Sep 2020 in eess.IV, cs.CV, and cs.LG

Abstract: Purpose: To develop and evaluate the accuracy of a multi-view deep learning approach to the analysis of high-resolution synthetic mammograms from digital breast tomosynthesis screening cases, and to assess the effect on accuracy of image resolution and training set size. Materials and Methods: In a retrospective study, 21,264 screening digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) exams obtained at our institution were collected along with associated radiology reports. The 2D synthetic mammographic images from these exams, with varying resolutions and data set sizes, were used to train a multi-view deep convolutional neural network (MV-CNN) to classify screening images into BI-RADS classes (BI-RADS 0, 1 and 2) before evaluation on a held-out set of exams. Results: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for BI-RADS 0 vs non-BI-RADS 0 class was 0.912 for the MV-CNN trained on the full dataset. The model obtained accuracy of 84.8%, recall of 95.9% and precision of 95.0%. This AUC value decreased when the same model was trained with 50% and 25% of images (AUC = 0.877, P=0.010 and 0.834, P=0.009 respectively). Also, the performance dropped when the same model was trained using images that were under-sampled by 1/2 and 1/4 (AUC = 0.870, P=0.011 and 0.813, P=0.009 respectively). Conclusion: This deep learning model classified high-resolution synthetic mammography scans into normal vs needing further workup using tens of thousands of high-resolution images. Smaller training data sets and lower resolution images both caused significant decrease in performance.

Citations (5)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.