Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The Double Exponential Runtime is Tight for 2-Stage Stochastic ILPs

Published 29 Aug 2020 in cs.CC and cs.DM | (2008.12928v3)

Abstract: We consider fundamental algorithmic number theoretic problems and their relation to a class of block structured Integer Linear Programs (ILPs) called $2$-stage stochastic. A $2$-stage stochastic ILP is an integer program of the form min⁡c<sup>T</sup>x∣Ax=b,ℓ≤x≤u,x∈Z<sup>r</sup>+ns\min {c<sup>T</sup> x \mid \mathcal{A} x = b, \ell \leq x \leq u, x \in \mathbb{Z}<sup>{r</sup> + ns} } where the constraint matrix A∈Z<sup>nt</sup>×r+ns\mathcal{A} \in \mathbb{Z}<sup>{nt</sup> \times r +ns} consists of nn matrices Ai∈Z<sup>t</sup>×rA_i \in \mathbb{Z}<sup>{t</sup> \times r} on the vertical line and nn matrices Bi∈Z<sup>t</sup>×sB_i \in \mathbb{Z}<sup>{t</sup> \times s} on the diagonal line aside. First, we show a stronger hardness result for a number theoretic problem called Quadratic Congruences where the objective is to compute a number z≤γz \leq \gamma satisfying z<sup>2</sup>≡α mod βz<sup>2</sup> \equiv \alpha \bmod \beta for given α,β,γ∈Z\alpha, \beta, \gamma \in \mathbb{Z}. This problem was proven to be NP-hard already in 1978 by Manders and Adleman. However, this hardness only applies for instances where the prime factorization of β\beta admits large multiplicities of each prime number. We circumvent this necessity proving that the problem remains NP-hard, even if each prime number only occurs constantly often. Then, using this new hardness result for the Quadratic Congruences problem, we prove a lower bound of 2<sup>2<sup>δ(s+t)</sup></sup>∣I∣<sup>O(1)2<sup>{2<sup>{\delta(s+t)}}</sup></sup> |I|<sup>{O(1)} for some $\delta &gt; 0$ for the running time of any algorithm solving $2$-stage stochastic ILPs assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). Here, ∣I∣|I| is the encoding length of the instance. This result even holds if rr, ∣∣b∣∣<em>∞||b||<em>{\infty}, ∣∣c∣∣</em>∞,∣∣ℓ∣∣∞||c||</em>{\infty}, ||\ell||_{\infty} and the largest absolute value Δ\Delta in the constraint matrix A\mathcal{A} are constant. This shows that the state-of-the-art algorithms are nearly tight. Further, it proves the suspicion that these ILPs are indeed harder to solve than the closely related nn-fold ILPs where the contraint matrix is the transpose of A\mathcal A.

Citations (13)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.