Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 49 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 172 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Mitigating the Latency-Area Tradeoffs for DRAM Design with Coarse-Grained Monolithic 3D (M3D) Integration (2008.11367v1)

Published 26 Aug 2020 in cs.AR

Abstract: Over the years, the DRAM latency has not scaled proportionally with its density due to the cost-centric mindset of the DRAM industry. Prior work has shown that this shortcoming can be overcome by reducing the critical length of DRAM access path. However, doing so decreases DRAM area-efficiency, exacerbating the latency-area tradeoffs for DRAM design. In this paper, we show that reorganizing DRAM cell-arrays using the emerging monolithic 3D (M3D) integration technology can mitigate these fundamental latency-area tradeoffs. Based on our evaluation results for PARSEC benchmarks, our designed M3D DRAM cell-array organizations can yield up to 9.56% less latency, up to 4.96% less power consumption, and up to 21.21% less energy-delay product (EDP), with up to 14% less DRAM die area, com-pared to the conventional 2D DDR4 DRAM.

Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.