Emergent Mind

Cut Sparsification of the Clique Beyond the Ramanujan Bound: A Separation of Cut Versus Spectral Sparsification

(2008.05648)
Published Aug 13, 2020 in cs.DS , cs.DM , math.CO , and math.PR

Abstract

We prove that a random $d$-regular graph, with high probability, is a cut sparsifier of the clique with approximation error at most $\left(2\sqrt{\frac 2 \pi} + o{n,d}(1)\right)/\sqrt d$, where $2\sqrt{\frac 2 \pi} = 1.595\ldots$ and $o{n,d}(1)$ denotes an error term that depends on $n$ and $d$ and goes to zero if we first take the limit $n\rightarrow \infty$ and then the limit $d \rightarrow \infty$. This is established by analyzing linear-size cuts using techniques of Jagannath and Sen derived from ideas in statistical physics, and analyzing small cuts via martingale inequalities. We also prove new lower bounds on spectral sparsification of the clique. If $G$ is a spectral sparsifier of the clique and $G$ has average degree $d$, we prove that the approximation error is at least the "Ramanujan bound'' $(2-o{n,d}(1))/\sqrt d$, which is met by $d$-regular Ramanujan graphs, provided that either the weighted adjacency matrix of $G$ is a (multiple of) a doubly stochastic matrix, or that $G$ satisfies a certain high "odd pseudo-girth" property. The first case can be seen as an "Alon-Boppana theorem for symmetric doubly stochastic matrices," showing that a symmetric doubly stochastic matrix with $dn$ non-zero entries has a non-trivial eigenvalue of magnitude at least $(2-o{n,d}(1))/\sqrt d$; the second case generalizes a lower bound of Srivastava and Trevisan, which requires a large girth assumption. Together, these results imply a separation between spectral sparsification and cut sparsification. If $G$ is a random $\log n$-regular graph on $n$ vertices, we show that, with high probability, $G$ admits a (weighted subgraph) cut sparsifier of average degree $d$ and approximation error at most $(1.595\ldots + o{n,d}(1))/\sqrt d$, while every (weighted subgraph) spectral sparsifier of $G$ having average degree $d$ has approximation error at least $(2-o{n,d}(1))/\sqrt d$.

We're not able to analyze this paper right now due to high demand.

Please check back later (sorry!).

Generate a summary of this paper on our Pro plan:

We ran into a problem analyzing this paper.

Newsletter

Get summaries of trending comp sci papers delivered straight to your inbox:

Unsubscribe anytime.