Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 49 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 172 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Stable Matching Games (2008.01680v4)

Published 4 Aug 2020 in cs.GT

Abstract: Gale and Shapley introduced a matching problem between two sets of agents where each agent on one side has an exogenous preference ordering over the agents on the other side. They defined a matching as stable if no unmatched pair can both improve their utility by forming a new pair. They proved, algorithmically, the existence of a stable matching. Shapley and Shubik, Demange and Gale, and many others extended the model by allowing monetary transfers. We offer a further extension by assuming that matched couples obtain their payoff endogenously as the outcome of a strategic game they have to play in a usual non-cooperative sense (without commitment) or in a semi-cooperative way (with commitment, as the outcome of a bilateral binding contract in which each player is responsible for her part of the contract). Depending on whether the players can commit or not, we define in each case a solution concept that combines Gale-Shapley pairwise stability with a (generalized) Nash equilibrium stability. In each case we give necessary and sufficient conditions for the set of solutions to be non-empty and provide an algorithm to compute a solution.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (35)
  1. Bargaining and reputation. Econometrica, 68(1):85–117.
  2. A perspective on renegotiation in repeated games. Springer.
  3. Renegotiation and symmetry in repeated games. Journal of Economic Theory, 60(2):217–240.
  4. A note on strictly competitive games. In International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics, pages 471–474. Springer.
  5. Renegotiation-proof climate agreements with full participation: Conditions for pareto-efficiency. Environmental and Resource Economics, 43(4):519–533.
  6. Aumann, R. J. (1961). Almost strictly competitive games. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 9(4):544–550.
  7. Long-term competition—a game-theoretic analysis. In Essays in game theory, pages 1–15. Springer, New York.
  8. Of stable marriages and graphs, and strategy and polytopes. SIAM review, 39(4):575–604.
  9. Graphs and marriages. The American mathematical monthly, 105(5):430–445.
  10. On the existence of pairwise stable weighted networks. Mathematics of Operations Research, to appear.
  11. Matching to share risk. Theoretical Economics, 11(1):227–251.
  12. Job matching with heterogeneous firms and workers. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 437–450.
  13. The strategy structure of two-sided matching markets. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 873–888.
  14. Multi-item auctions. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4):863–872.
  15. Dewatripont, M. (1988). Commitment through renegotiation-proof contracts with third parties. The Review of Economic Studies, 55(3):377–390.
  16. Finite-dimensional variational inequalities and complementarity problems. Springer Science & Business Media, New York.
  17. Renegotiation-proof equilibrium: Reply. Journal of Economic Theory, 49(2):376–378.
  18. College admissions and the stability of marriage. The American Mathematical Monthly, 69(1):9–15.
  19. Garrido Lucero, F. (2022). Stable Matching Games. Theses, Université Paris sciences et lettres.
  20. Harker, P. T. (1991). Generalized Nash games and quasi-variational inequalities. European journal of Operational research, 54(1):81–94.
  21. Matching with contracts. American Economic Review, 95(4):913–935.
  22. A strategic model of economic and social network. J Econ Theory, 71:44–74.
  23. Job matching, coalition formation, and gross substitutes. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 1483–1504.
  24. Investment and competitive matching. Econometrica, 83(3):835–896.
  25. Noor, M. A. (1988). Quasi variational inequalities. Applied Mathematics Letters, 1(4):367–370.
  26. Bargaining and markets. Academic Press, Inc.
  27. Pearce, D. G. (1987). Renegotiation-proof equilibria: Collective rationality and intertemporal cooperation.
  28. Quinzii, M. (1984). Core and competitive equilibria with indivisibilities. International Journal of Game Theory, 13(1):41–60.
  29. Reny, P. J. (1999). On the existence of pure and mixed strategy Nash equilibria in discontinuous games. Econometrica, 67(5):1029–1056.
  30. Two-sided matching. Handbook of game theory with economic applications, 1:485–541.
  31. Rothblum, U. G. (1992). Characterization of stable matchings as extreme points of a polytope. Mathematical Programming, 54(1-3):57–67.
  32. Renegotiation-proof implementation and time preferences. The American Economic Review, pages 600–614.
  33. The assignment game I: The core. International Journal of game theory, 1(1):111–130.
  34. Van Damme, E. (1989). Renegotiation-proof equilibria in repeated prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Economic theory, 47(1):206–217.
  35. Vate, J. H. V. (1989). Linear programming brings marital bliss. Operations Research Letters, 8(3):147–153.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com