Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

On Hyperparameter Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms: Theory and Practice (2007.15745v3)

Published 30 Jul 2020 in cs.LG and stat.ML

Abstract: Machine learning algorithms have been used widely in various applications and areas. To fit a machine learning model into different problems, its hyper-parameters must be tuned. Selecting the best hyper-parameter configuration for machine learning models has a direct impact on the model's performance. It often requires deep knowledge of machine learning algorithms and appropriate hyper-parameter optimization techniques. Although several automatic optimization techniques exist, they have different strengths and drawbacks when applied to different types of problems. In this paper, optimizing the hyper-parameters of common machine learning models is studied. We introduce several state-of-the-art optimization techniques and discuss how to apply them to machine learning algorithms. Many available libraries and frameworks developed for hyper-parameter optimization problems are provided, and some open challenges of hyper-parameter optimization research are also discussed in this paper. Moreover, experiments are conducted on benchmark datasets to compare the performance of different optimization methods and provide practical examples of hyper-parameter optimization. This survey paper will help industrial users, data analysts, and researchers to better develop machine learning models by identifying the proper hyper-parameter configurations effectively.

Citations (1,686)

Summary

  • The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of HPO techniques, including grid search, random search, and Bayesian methods for model tuning.
  • It evaluates optimization algorithms through benchmark experiments, highlighting the efficiency of BO-TPE and metaheuristic methods in large search spaces.
  • The paper emphasizes challenges such as high evaluation costs and search space complexity, proposing directions for future research in adaptive HPO.

Overview

The paper "On Hyperparameter Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms: Theory and Practice" (2007.15745) provides a comprehensive paper on hyperparameter optimization (HPO) for ML algorithms. The authors discuss the significance of hyperparameter tuning, present various optimization techniques, and examine their practical applications and challenges in real-world scenarios. This survey aims to aid researchers and industry practitioners in improving model performance through effective hyperparameter configurations.

Hyperparameters in Machine Learning

Machine learning models contain hyperparameters that dictate their structure and behavior, which must be set before training. The paper categorizes hyperparameters into categorical, discrete, continuous, and conditional types, each affecting model performance differently. Manual hyperparameter tuning is time-consuming and often ineffective for complex models with many hyperparameters. An automated process known as hyperparameter optimization (HPO) addresses these challenges, aiming to find optimal configurations, reduce tuning-related human effort, and enhance model performance. Selecting an appropriate optimization technique is crucial given the non-convex and non-differentiable nature of many HPO problems.

Optimization Algorithms

The paper outlines various optimization methods applicable to HPO:

  • Grid Search (GS): Exhaustive evaluation of hyperparameter combinations. Simple but computationally expensive and often impractical for high-dimensional spaces.
  • Random Search (RS): Random selection of hyperparameter configurations to explore larger search spaces with fixed budget constraints. More efficient than GS but can involve unnecessary evaluations.
  • Bayesian Optimization (BO): Utilizes surrogate models and acquisition functions to inform subsequent evaluations based on prior results, efficiently detecting optimal configurations. Includes variants like Gaussian Processes (GP), Random Forests (RF), and Tree-structured Parzen Estimators (TPE).
  • Gradient-based Optimization: Traditional approach for continuous hyperparameters, but may result in local rather than global optima for non-convex problems.
  • Multi-fidelity Methods: Includes Hyperband and Successive Halving, employing subsets of data for evaluations to save time and resources.
  • Metaheuristic Algorithms: Population-based approaches such as Genetic Algorithms (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) that handle large search spaces, enabling efficient parallelization.

Applications and Frameworks

Various frameworks implement the outlined optimization techniques to facilitate HPO in practical settings. Examples include Scikit-learn’s GridSearchCV and RandomizedSearchCV, Spearmint for Bayesian optimization with GP, Hyperopt and SMAC for model-free and model-based optimization methods, as well as Optunity and TPOT for evolutionary approaches. Each framework offers different strengths, catering to specific use cases and computational resources.

Experimental Results

Experiments conducted using different HPO methods on benchmark datasets demonstrate performance variations across techniques. Bayesian optimization methods, especially BO-TPE and BOHB, exhibit robust performance in detecting near-optimal configurations with relatively low computational overhead compared to traditional grid and random search methods. Metaheuristic methods like PSO are particularly effective in large configuration spaces due to parallelization capabilities.

Challenges and Future Directions

Despite advancements in HPO methods, challenges remain, such as high objective function evaluation costs, complex search spaces, randomness, overfitting, and generalization. Current HPO methods must improve anytime performance and scalability across platforms and data volumes. Future research might focus on integrating evolutionary techniques with existing algorithms and developing benchmarks for effective comparison across methods.

Conclusion

ML model performance is closely linked to hyperparameter configurations, necessitating efficient HPO methods to automatically determine optimal setups. The survey provides key insights into existing techniques and frameworks, offering guidance for successfully implementing HPO in various ML contexts. Enhanced methods with capability to continuously update configurations based on live data changes are anticipated to further improve HPO efficacy in dynamic environments.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Authors (2)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 3 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: