Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 48 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 205 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 473 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

On Indexing and Compressing Finite Automata (2007.07718v1)

Published 15 Jul 2020 in cs.DS

Abstract: An index for a finite automaton is a powerful data structure that supports locating paths labeled with a query pattern, thus solving pattern matching on the underlying regular language. In this paper, we solve the long-standing problem of indexing arbitrary finite automata. Our solution consists in finding a partial co-lexicographic order of the states and proving, as in the total order case, that states reached by a given string form one interval on the partial order, thus enabling indexing. We provide a lower bound stating that such an interval requires $O(p)$ words to be represented, $p$ being the order's width (i.e. the size of its largest antichain). Indeed, we show that $p$ determines the complexity of several fundamental problems on finite automata: (i) Letting $\sigma$ be the alphabet size, we provide an encoding for NFAs using $\lceil\log \sigma\rceil + 2\lceil\log p\rceil + 2$ bits per transition and a smaller encoding for DFAs using $\lceil\log \sigma\rceil + \lceil\log p\rceil + 2$ bits per transition. This is achieved by generalizing the Burrows-Wheeler transform to arbitrary automata. (ii) We show that indexed pattern matching can be solved in $\tilde O(m\cdot p2)$ query time on NFAs. (iii) We provide a polynomial-time algorithm to index DFAs, while matching the optimal value for $ p $. On the other hand, we prove that the problem is NP-hard on NFAs. (iv) We show that, in the worst case, the classic powerset construction algorithm for NFA determinization generates an equivalent DFA of size $2p(n-p+1)-1$, where $n$ is the number of NFA's states.

Citations (35)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.