Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 39 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 91 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 191 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 456 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Deep Surrogate Models for Multi-dimensional Regression of Reactor Power (2007.05435v2)

Published 10 Jul 2020 in physics.comp-ph and cs.LG

Abstract: There is renewed interest in developing small modular reactors and micro-reactors. Innovation is necessary in both construction and operation methods of these reactors to be financially attractive. For operation, an area of interest is the development of fully autonomous reactor control. Significant efforts are necessary to demonstrate an autonomous control framework for a nuclear system, while adhering to established safety criteria. Our group has proposed and received support for demonstration of an autonomous framework on a subcritical system: the MIT Graphite Exponential Pile. In order to have a fast response (on the order of miliseconds), we must extract specific capabilities of general-purpose system codes to a surrogate model. Thus, we have adopted current state-of-the-art neural network libraries to build surrogate models. This work focuses on establishing the capability of neural networks to provide an accurate and precise multi-dimensional regression of a nuclear reactor's power distribution. We assess using a neural network surrogate against a previously validated model: an MCNP5 model of the MIT reactor. The results indicate that neural networks are an appropriate choice for surrogate models to implement in an autonomous reactor control framework. The MAPE across all test datasets was < 1.16 % with a corresponding standard deviation of < 0.77 %. The error is low, considering that the node-wise fission power can vary from 7 kW to 30 kW across the core.

Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.