Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 147 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 90 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 192 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 424 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Minimizing Convex Functions with Rational Minimizers (2007.01445v5)

Published 3 Jul 2020 in cs.DS, cs.DM, cs.IT, math.IT, and math.OC

Abstract: Given a separation oracle $\mathsf{SO}$ for a convex function $f$ defined on $\mathbb{R}n$ that has an integral minimizer inside a box with radius $R$, we show how to find an exact minimizer of $f$ using at most (a) $O(n (n \log \log (n)/\log (n) + \log(R)))$ calls to $\mathsf{SO}$ and $\mathsf{poly}(n, \log(R))$ arithmetic operations, or (b) $O(n \log(nR))$ calls to $\mathsf{SO}$ and $\exp(O(n)) \cdot \mathsf{poly}(\log(R))$ arithmetic operations. When the set of minimizers of $f$ has integral extreme points, our algorithm outputs an integral minimizer of $f$. This improves upon the previously best oracle complexity of $O(n2 (n + \log(R)))$ for polynomial time algorithms and $O(n2\log(nR))$ for exponential time algorithms obtained by [Gr\"otschel, Lov\'asz and Schrijver, Prog. Comb. Opt. 1984, Springer 1988] over thirty years ago. Our improvement on Gr\"otschel, Lov\'asz and Schrijver's result generalizes to the setting where the set of minimizers of $f$ is a rational polyhedron with bounded vertex complexity. For the Submodular Function Minimization problem, our result immediately implies a strongly polynomial algorithm that makes at most $O(n3 \log \log (n)/\log (n))$ calls to an evaluation oracle, and an exponential time algorithm that makes at most $O(n2 \log(n))$ calls to an evaluation oracle. These improve upon the previously best $O(n3 \log2(n))$ oracle complexity for strongly polynomial algorithms given in [Lee, Sidford and Wong, FOCS 2015] and [Dadush, V\'egh and Zambelli, SODA 2018], and an exponential time algorithm with oracle complexity $O(n3 \log(n))$ given in the former work. Our result is achieved via a reduction to the Shortest Vector Problem in lattices. We analyze its oracle complexity using a potential function that simultaneously captures the size of the search set and the density of the lattice.

Citations (5)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.