Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 37 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 10 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 84 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 448 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Minimizing Convex Functions with Rational Minimizers (2007.01445v5)

Published 3 Jul 2020 in cs.DS, cs.DM, cs.IT, math.IT, and math.OC

Abstract: Given a separation oracle $\mathsf{SO}$ for a convex function $f$ defined on $\mathbb{R}n$ that has an integral minimizer inside a box with radius $R$, we show how to find an exact minimizer of $f$ using at most (a) $O(n (n \log \log (n)/\log (n) + \log(R)))$ calls to $\mathsf{SO}$ and $\mathsf{poly}(n, \log(R))$ arithmetic operations, or (b) $O(n \log(nR))$ calls to $\mathsf{SO}$ and $\exp(O(n)) \cdot \mathsf{poly}(\log(R))$ arithmetic operations. When the set of minimizers of $f$ has integral extreme points, our algorithm outputs an integral minimizer of $f$. This improves upon the previously best oracle complexity of $O(n2 (n + \log(R)))$ for polynomial time algorithms and $O(n2\log(nR))$ for exponential time algorithms obtained by [Gr\"otschel, Lov\'asz and Schrijver, Prog. Comb. Opt. 1984, Springer 1988] over thirty years ago. Our improvement on Gr\"otschel, Lov\'asz and Schrijver's result generalizes to the setting where the set of minimizers of $f$ is a rational polyhedron with bounded vertex complexity. For the Submodular Function Minimization problem, our result immediately implies a strongly polynomial algorithm that makes at most $O(n3 \log \log (n)/\log (n))$ calls to an evaluation oracle, and an exponential time algorithm that makes at most $O(n2 \log(n))$ calls to an evaluation oracle. These improve upon the previously best $O(n3 \log2(n))$ oracle complexity for strongly polynomial algorithms given in [Lee, Sidford and Wong, FOCS 2015] and [Dadush, V\'egh and Zambelli, SODA 2018], and an exponential time algorithm with oracle complexity $O(n3 \log(n))$ given in the former work. Our result is achieved via a reduction to the Shortest Vector Problem in lattices. We analyze its oracle complexity using a potential function that simultaneously captures the size of the search set and the density of the lattice.

Citations (5)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)