Abstract
For a permutation $\pi: [K]\rightarrow [K]$, a sequence $f: {1,2,\cdots, n}\rightarrow \mathbb R$ contains a $\pi$-pattern of size $K$, if there is a sequence of indices $(i1, i2, \cdots, iK)$ ($i1<i2<\cdots<iK$), satisfying that $f(ia)<f(ib)$ if $\pi(a)<\pi(b)$, for $a,b\in [K]$. Otherwise, $f$ is referred to as $\pi$-free. For the special case where $\pi = (1,2,\cdots, K)$, it is referred to as the monotone pattern. \cite{newman2017testing} initiated the study of testing $\pi$-freeness with one-sided error. They focused on two specific problems, testing the monotone permutations and the $(1,3,2)$ permutation. For the problem of testing monotone permutation $(1,2,\cdots,K)$, \cite{ben2019finding} improved the $(\log n){O(K2)}$ non-adaptive query complexity of \cite{newman2017testing} to $O((\log n){\lfloor \log_{2} K\rfloor})$. Further, \cite{ben2019optimal} proposed an adaptive algorithm with $O(\log n)$ query complexity. However, no progress has yet been made on the problem of testing $(1,3,2)$-freeness. In this work, we present an adaptive algorithm for testing $(1,3,2)$-freeness. The query complexity of our algorithm is $O(\epsilon{-2}\log4 n)$, which significantly improves over the $O(\epsilon{-7}\log{26}n)$-query adaptive algorithm of \cite{newman2017testing}. This improvement is mainly achieved by the proposal of a new structure embedded in the patterns.
We're not able to analyze this paper right now due to high demand.
Please check back later (sorry!).
Generate a summary of this paper on our Pro plan:
We ran into a problem analyzing this paper.