Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The Isometry-Dual Property in Flags of Two-Point Algebraic Geometry Codes

Published 25 May 2020 in cs.IT, math.AG, and math.IT | (2005.12239v2)

Abstract: A flag of codes C0⊊C1⊊⋯⊊Cs⊆F<em>q<sup>nC_0 \subsetneq C_1 \subsetneq \cdots \subsetneq C_s \subseteq {\mathbb F}<em>q<sup>n is said to satisfy the {\it isometry-dual property} if there exists x∈(Fq<sup>∗)<sup>n{\bf x}\in (\mathbb{F}_q<sup>*)<sup>n such that the code CiC_i is {\bf x}-isometric to the dual code C</em>s−i<sup>⊥C</em>{s-i}<sup>\perp for all i=0,…,si=0,\ldots, s. For PP and QQ rational places in a function field F{\mathcal F}, we investigate the existence of isometry-dual flags of codes in the families of two-point algebraic geometry codes CL(D,a0P+bQ)⊊CL(D,a1P+bQ)⊊⋯⊊CL(D,asP+bQ),C_\mathcal L(D, a_0P+bQ)\subsetneq C_\mathcal L(D, a_1P+bQ)\subsetneq \dots \subsetneq C_\mathcal L(D, a_sP+bQ), where the divisor DD is the sum of pairwise different rational places of F{\mathcal F} and P,QP, Q are not in $\mbox{supp}(D)$. We characterize those sequences in terms of bb for general function fields. We then apply the result to the broad class of Kummer extensions F{\mathcal F} defined by affine equations of the form y<sup>m=f(x)y<sup>m=f(x), for f(x)f(x) a separable polynomial of degree rr, where $\mbox{gcd}(r, m)=1$. For PP the rational place at infinity and QQ the rational place associated to one of the roots of f(x)f(x), it is shown that the flag of two-point algebraic geometry codes has the isometry-dual property if and only if mm divides $2b+1$. At the end we illustrate our results by applying them to two-point codes over several well know function fields.

Citations (4)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.