Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 28 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 197 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 471 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Performance Evaluation of Secure Multi-party Computation on Heterogeneous Nodes (2004.10926v1)

Published 23 Apr 2020 in cs.CR, cs.DC, and cs.PF

Abstract: Secure multi-party computation (MPC) is a broad cryptographic concept that can be adopted for privacy-preserving computation. With MPC, a number of parties can collaboratively compute a function, without revealing the actual input or output of the plaintext to others. The applications of MPC range from privacy-preserving voting, arithmetic calculation, and large-scale data analysis. From the system perspective, each party in MPC can run on one compute node. The compute nodes of multiple parties could be either homogeneous or heterogeneous; however, the distributed workloads from the MPC protocols tend to be always homogeneous (symmetric). In this work, we study a representative MPC framework and a set of MPC applications from the system performance perspective. We show the detailed online computation workflow of a state-of-the-art MPC protocol and analyze the root cause of its stall time and performance bottleneck on homogeneous and heterogeneous compute nodes.

Citations (1)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)