Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Log-Concave Polynomials IV: Approximate Exchange, Tight Mixing Times, and Near-Optimal Sampling of Forests (2004.07220v2)

Published 15 Apr 2020 in cs.DS, cs.DM, and math.PR

Abstract: We prove tight mixing time bounds for natural random walks on bases of matroids, determinantal distributions, and more generally distributions associated with log-concave polynomials. For a matroid of rank $k$ on a ground set of $n$ elements, or more generally distributions associated with log-concave polynomials of homogeneous degree $k$ on $n$ variables, we show that the down-up random walk, started from an arbitrary point in the support, mixes in time $O(k\log k)$. Our bound has no dependence on $n$ or the starting point, unlike the previous analyses [ALOV19,CGM19], and is tight up to constant factors. The main new ingredient is a property we call approximate exchange, a generalization of well-studied exchange properties for matroids and valuated matroids, which may be of independent interest. In particular, given function $\mu: {[n] \choose k} \to \mathbb{R}{\geq 0},$ our approximate exchange property implies that a simple local search algorithm gives a $k{O(k)}$-approximation of $\max{S} \mu(S)$ when $\mu$ is generated by a log-concave polynomial, and that greedy gives the same approximation ratio when $\mu$ is strongly Rayleigh. As an application, we show how to leverage down-up random walks to approximately sample random forests or random spanning trees in a graph with $n$ edges in time $O(n\log2 n).$ The best known result for sampling random forest was a FPAUS with high polynomial runtime recently found by \cite{ALOV19, CGM19}. For spanning tree, we improve on the almost-linear time algorithm by [Sch18]. Our analysis works on weighted graphs too, and is the first to achieve nearly-linear running time for these problems.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Nima Anari (43 papers)
  2. Kuikui Liu (14 papers)
  3. Shayan Oveis Gharan (50 papers)
  4. Cynthia Vinzant (35 papers)
  5. Thuy Duong Vuong (4 papers)
Citations (15)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.