Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 168 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 79 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 160 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 430 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 33 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

On the worst-case error of least squares algorithms for $L_2$-approximation with high probability (2003.11947v1)

Published 25 Mar 2020 in math.NA and cs.NA

Abstract: It was recently shown in [4] that, for $L_2$-approximation of functions from a Hilbert space, function values are almost as powerful as arbitrary linear information, if the approximation numbers are square-summable. That is, we showed that [ e_n \,\lesssim\, \sqrt{\frac{1}{k_n} \sum_{j\geq k_n} a_j2} \qquad \text{ with }\quad k_n \asymp \frac{n}{\ln(n)}, ] where $e_n$ are the sampling numbers and $a_k$ are the approximation numbers. In particular, if $(a_k)\in\ell_2$, then $e_n$ and $a_n$ are of the same polynomial order. For this, we presented an explicit (weighted least squares) algorithm based on i.i.d. random points and proved that this works with positive probability. This implies the existence of a good deterministic sampling algorithm. Here, we present a modification of the proof in [4] that shows that the same algorithm works with probability at least $1-{n{-c}}$ for all $c>0$.

Citations (16)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.