Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 42 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 217 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 474 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Combinatorial proofs of two theorems of Lutz and Stull (2002.01743v2)

Published 5 Feb 2020 in math.CA, cs.CC, and math.MG

Abstract: Recently, Lutz and Stull used methods from algorithmic information theory to prove two new Marstrand-type projection theorems, concerning subsets of Euclidean space which are not assumed to be Borel, or even analytic. One of the theorems states that if $K \subset \mathbb{R}{n}$ is any set with equal Hausdorff and packing dimensions, then $$ \dim_{\mathrm{H}} \pi_{e}(K) = \min{\dim_{\mathrm{H}} K,1} $$ for almost every $e \in S{n - 1}$. Here $\pi_{e}$ stands for orthogonal projection to $\mathrm{span}(e)$. The primary purpose of this paper is to present proofs for Lutz and Stull's projection theorems which do not refer to information theoretic concepts. Instead, they will rely on combinatorial-geometric arguments, such as discretised versions of Kaufman's "potential theoretic" method, the pigeonhole principle, and a lemma of Katz and Tao. A secondary purpose is to slightly generalise Lutz and Stull's theorems: the versions in this paper apply to orthogonal projections to $m$-planes in $\mathbb{R}{n}$, for all $0 < m < n$.

Citations (7)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)