Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 60 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 77 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 159 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 456 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Near-Additive Spanners and Near-Exact Hopsets, A Unified View (2001.07477v1)

Published 21 Jan 2020 in cs.DS

Abstract: Given an {\em unweighted} undirected graph $G = (V,E)$, and a pair of parameters $\epsilon > 0$, $\beta = 1,2,\ldots$, a subgraph $G' =(V,H)$, $H \subseteq E$, of $G$ is a {\em $(1+\epsilon,\beta)$-spanner} (aka, a {\em near-additive spanner}) of $G$ if for every $u,v \in V$, $$d_{G'}(u,v) \le (1+\epsilon)d_G(u,v) + \beta~.$$ It was shown in \cite{EP01} that for any $n$-vertex $G$ as above, and any $\epsilon > 0$ and $\kappa = 1,2,\ldots$, there exists a $(1+\epsilon,\beta)$-spanner $G'$ with $O_{\epsilon,\kappa}(n{1+1/\kappa})$ edges, with $$\beta = \beta_{EP} = \left({{\log \kappa} \over \epsilon}\right){\log \kappa - 2}~.$$ This bound remains state-of-the-art, and its dependence on $\epsilon$ (for the case of small $\kappa$) was shown to be tight in \cite{ABP18}. Given a {\em weighted} undirected graph $G = (V,E,\omega)$, and a pair of parameters $\epsilon > 0$, $\beta = 1,2,\ldots$, a graph $G'= (V,H,\omega')$ is a {\em $(1+\epsilon,\beta)$-hopset} (aka, a {\em near-exact hopset}) of $G$ if for every $u,v \in V$, $$d_G(u,v) \le d_{G\cup G'}{(\beta)}(u,v) \le (1+\epsilon)d_G(u,v)~,$$ where $ d_{G\cup G'}{(\beta)}(u,v)$ stands for a $\beta$-(hop)-bounded distance between $u$ and $v$ in the union graph $G \cup G'$. It was shown in \cite{EN16} that for any $n$-vertex $G$ and $\epsilon$ and $\kappa$ as above, there exists a $(1+\epsilon,\beta)$-hopset with $\tilde{O}(n{1+1/\kappa})$ edges, with $\beta = \beta_{EP}$. Not only the two results of \cite{EP01} and \cite{EN16} are strikingly similar, but so are also their proof techniques. Moreover, Thorup-Zwick's later construction of near-additive spanners \cite{TZ06} was also shown in \cite{EN19,HP17} to provide hopsets with analogous (to that of \cite{TZ06}) properties. In this survey we explore this intriguing phenomenon, sketch the basic proof techniques used for these results, and highlight open questions.

Citations (17)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.