Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 45 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 22 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 183 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 467 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Isogeometric continuity constraints for multi-patch shells governed by fourth-order deformation and phase field models (2001.05964v3)

Published 16 Jan 2020 in cs.CE

Abstract: This work presents numerical techniques to enforce continuity constraints on multi-patch surfaces for three distinct problem classes. The first involves structural analysis of thin shells that are described by general Kirchhoff-Love kinematics. Their governing equation is a vector-valued, fourth-order, nonlinear, partial differential equation (PDE) that requires at least $C1$-continuity within a displacement-based finite element formulation. The second class are surface phase separations modeled by a phase field. Their governing equation is the Cahn-Hilliard equation - a scalar, fourth-order, nonlinear PDE - that can be coupled to the thin shell PDE. The third class are brittle fracture processes modeled by a phase field approach. In this work, these are described by a scalar, fourth-order, nonlinear PDE that is similar to the Cahn-Hilliard equation and is also coupled to the thin shell PDE. Using a direct finite element discretization, the two phase field equations also require at least a $C1$-continuous formulation. Isogeometric surface discretizations - often composed of multiple patches - thus require constraints that enforce the $C1$-continuity of displacement and phase field. For this, two numerical strategies are presented: For this, two numerical strategies are presented: A Lagrange multiplier formulation and a penalty method. The curvilinear shell model including the geometrical constraints is taken from Duong et al. (2017) and it is extended to model the coupled phase field problems on thin shells of Zimmermann et al. (2019) and Paul et al. (2020) on multi-patches. Their accuracy and convergence are illustrated by several numerical examples considering deforming shells, phase separations on evolving surfaces, and dynamic brittle fracture of thin shells.

Citations (20)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.