Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 149 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 34 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 73 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 207 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 442 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Gradient Method for Continuous Influence Maximization with Budget-Saving Considerations (1911.09100v1)

Published 21 Nov 2019 in math.OC and cs.SI

Abstract: Continuous influence maximization (CIM) generalizes the original influence maximization by incorporating general marketing strategies: a marketing strategy mix is a vector $\boldsymbol x = (x_1,\dots,x_d)$ such that for each node $v$ in a social network, $v$ could be activated as a seed of diffusion with probability $h_v(\boldsymbol x)$, where $h_v$ is a strategy activation function satisfying DR-submodularity. CIM is the task of selecting a strategy mix $\boldsymbol x$ with constraint $\sum_i x_i \le k$ where $k$ is a budget constraint, such that the total number of activated nodes after the diffusion process, called influence spread and denoted as $g(\boldsymbol x)$, is maximized. In this paper, we extend CIM to consider budget saving, that is, each strategy mix $\boldsymbol x$ has a cost $c(\boldsymbol x)$ where $c$ is a convex cost function, we want to maximize the balanced sum $g(\boldsymbol x) + \lambda(k - c(\boldsymbol x))$ where $\lambda$ is a balance parameter, subject to the constraint of $c(\boldsymbol x) \le k$. We denote this problem as CIM-BS. The objective function of CIM-BS is neither monotone, nor DR-submodular or concave, and thus neither the greedy algorithm nor the standard result on gradient method could be directly applied. Our key innovation is the combination of the gradient method with reverse influence sampling to design algorithms that solve CIM-BS: For the general case, we give an algorithm that achieves $\left(\frac{1}{2}-\varepsilon\right)$-approximation, and for the case of independent strategy activations, we present an algorithm that achieves $\left(1-\frac{1}{e}-\varepsilon\right)$ approximation.

Citations (5)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.