Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Cluster Editing parameterized above modification-disjoint P3P_3-packings

Published 18 Oct 2019 in cs.CC and cs.DM | (1910.08517v3)

Abstract: Given a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) and an integer kk, the Cluster Editing problem asks whether we can transform GG into a union of vertex-disjoint cliques by at most kk modifications (edge deletions or insertions). In this paper, we study the following variant of Cluster Editing. We are given a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E), a packing H\cal H of modification-disjoint induced P3P_3s (no pair of P3P_3s in H\cal H share an edge or non-edge) and an integer ℓ\ell. The task is to decide whether GG can be transformed into a union of vertex-disjoint cliques by at most ℓ+∣H∣\ell+|\cal H| modifications (edge deletions or insertions). We show that this problem is NP-hard even when ℓ=0\ell=0 (in which case the problem asks to turn GG into a disjoint union of cliques by performing exactly one edge deletion or insertion per element of H\cal H) and when each vertex is in at most 23 P3P_3s of the packing. This answers negatively a question of van Bevern, Froese, and Komusiewicz (CSR 2016, ToCS 2018), repeated by C. Komusiewicz at Shonan meeting no. 144 in March 2019. We then initiate the study to find the largest integer cc such that the problem remains tractable when restricting to packings such that each vertex is in at most cc packed P3P_3s. Here packed P3P_3s are those belonging to the packing H\cal H. Van Bevern et al. showed that the case c=1c = 1 is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to ℓ\ell and we show that the case c=2c = 2 is solvable in ∣V∣<sup>2ℓ</sup>+O(1)|V|<sup>{2\ell</sup> + O(1)} time.

Citations (7)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.