Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 44 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 86 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 208 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Width Parameterizations for Knot-free Vertex Deletion on Digraphs (1910.01783v1)

Published 4 Oct 2019 in cs.DS and cs.DM

Abstract: A knot in a directed graph $G$ is a strongly connected subgraph $Q$ of $G$ with at least two vertices, such that no vertex in $V(Q)$ is an in-neighbor of a vertex in $V(G)\setminus V(Q)$. Knots are important graph structures, because they characterize the existence of deadlocks in a classical distributed computation model, the so-called OR-model. Deadlock detection is correlated with the recognition of knot-free graphs as well as deadlock resolution is closely related to the {\sc Knot-Free Vertex Deletion (KFVD)} problem, which consists of determining whether an input graph $G$ has a subset $S \subseteq V(G)$ of size at most $k$ such that $G[V\setminus S]$ contains no knot. In this paper we focus on graph width measure parameterizations for {\sc KFVD}. First, we show that: (i) {\sc KFVD} parameterized by the size of the solution $k$ is W[1]-hard even when $p$, the length of a longest directed path of the input graph, as well as $\kappa$, its Kenny-width, are bounded by constants, and we remark that {\sc KFVD} is para-NP-hard even considering many directed width measures as parameters, but in FPT when parameterized by clique-width; (ii) {\sc KFVD} can be solved in time $2{O(tw)}\times n$, but assuming ETH it cannot be solved in $2{o(tw)}\times n{O(1)}$, where $tw$ is the treewidth of the underlying undirected graph. Finally, since the size of a minimum directed feedback vertex set ($dfv$) is an upper bound for the size of a minimum knot-free vertex deletion set, we investigate parameterization by $dfv$ and we show that (iii) {\sc KFVD} can be solved in FPT-time parameterized by either $dfv+\kappa$ or $dfv+p$; and it admits a Turing kernel by the distance to a DAG having an Hamiltonian path.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.