Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 52 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 100 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 192 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 454 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

6DLS: Modeling Nonplanar Frictional Surface Contacts for Grasping using 6D Limit Surfaces (1909.06885v4)

Published 15 Sep 2019 in cs.RO

Abstract: Robot grasping with deformable gripper jaws results in nonplanar surface contacts if the jaws deform to the nonplanar local geometry of an object. The frictional force and torque that can be transmitted through a nonplanar surface contact are both three-dimensional, resulting in a six-dimensional frictional wrench (6DFW). Applying traditional planar contact models to such contacts leads to over-conservative results as the models do not consider the nonplanar surface geometry and only compute a three-dimensional subset of the 6DFW. To address this issue, we derive the 6DFW for nonplanar surfaces by combining concepts of differential geometry and Coulomb friction. We also propose two 6D limit surface (6DLS) models, generalized from well-known three-dimensional LS (3DLS) models, which describe the friction-motion constraints for a contact. We evaluate the 6DLS models by fitting them to the 6DFW samples obtained from six parametric surfaces and 2,932 meshed contacts from finite element method simulations of 24 rigid objects. We further present an algorithm to predict multicontact grasp success by building a grasp wrench space with the 6DLS model of each contact. To evaluate the algorithm, we collected 1,035 physical grasps of ten 3D-printed objects with a KUKA robot and a deformable parallel-jaw gripper. In our experiments, the algorithm achieves 66.8% precision, a metric inversely related to false positive predictions, and 76.9% recall, a metric inversely related to false negative predictions. The 6DLS models increase recall by up to 26.1% over 3DLS models with similar precision.

Citations (3)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.