Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 63 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 100 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 174 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Feedbackward Decoding for Semantic Segmentation (1908.08584v1)

Published 22 Aug 2019 in cs.CV, cs.CL, eess.IV, and stat.ML

Abstract: We propose a novel approach for semantic segmentation that uses an encoder in the reverse direction to decode. Many semantic segmentation networks adopt a feedforward encoder-decoder architecture. Typically, an input is first downsampled by the encoder to extract high-level semantic features and continues to be fed forward through the decoder module to recover low-level spatial clues. Our method works in an alternative direction that lets information flow backward from the last layer of the encoder towards the first. The encoder performs encoding in the forward pass and the same network performs decoding in the backward pass. Therefore, the encoder itself is also the decoder. Compared to conventional encoder-decoder architectures, ours doesn't require additional layers for decoding and further reuses the encoder weights thereby reducing the total number of parameters required for processing. We show by using only the 13 convolutional layers from VGG-16 plus one tiny classification layer, our model significantly outperforms other frequently cited models that are also adapted from VGG-16. On the Cityscapes semantic segmentation benchmark, our model uses 50.0% less parameters than SegNet and achieves an 18.1% higher "IoU class" score; it uses 28.3% less parameters than DeepLab LargeFOV and the achieved "IoU class" score is 3.9% higher; it uses 89.1% fewer parameters than FCN-8s and the achieved "IoU class" score is 3.1% higher. Our code will be publicly available on Github later.

Citations (2)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.