Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 157 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 46 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 88 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 160 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 397 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Efficient average-case population recovery in the presence of insertions and deletions (1907.05964v1)

Published 12 Jul 2019 in cs.DS, cs.IT, cs.LG, and math.IT

Abstract: Several recent works have considered the \emph{trace reconstruction problem}, in which an unknown source string $x\in{0,1}n$ is transmitted through a probabilistic channel which may randomly delete coordinates or insert random bits, resulting in a \emph{trace} of $x$. The goal is to reconstruct the original string~$x$ from independent traces of $x$. While the best algorithms known for worst-case strings use $\exp(O(n{1/3}))$ traces \cite{DOS17,NazarovPeres17}, highly efficient algorithms are known \cite{PZ17,HPP18} for the \emph{average-case} version, in which $x$ is uniformly random. We consider a generalization of this average-case trace reconstruction problem, which we call \emph{average-case population recovery in the presence of insertions and deletions}. In this problem, there is an unknown distribution $\cal{D}$ over $s$ unknown source strings $x1,\dots,xs \in {0,1}n$, and each sample is independently generated by drawing some $xi$ from $\cal{D}$ and returning an independent trace of $xi$. Building on \cite{PZ17} and \cite{HPP18}, we give an efficient algorithm for this problem. For any support size $s \leq \smash{\exp(\Theta(n{1/3}))}$, for a $1-o(1)$ fraction of all $s$-element support sets ${x1,\dots,xs} \subset {0,1}n$, for every distribution $\cal{D}$ supported on ${x1,\dots,xs}$, our algorithm efficiently recovers ${\cal D}$ up to total variation distance $\epsilon$ with high probability, given access to independent traces of independent draws from $\cal{D}$. The algorithm runs in time poly$(n,s,1/\epsilon)$ and its sample complexity is poly$(s,1/\epsilon,\exp(\log{1/3}n)).$ This polynomial dependence on the support size $s$ is in sharp contrast with the \emph{worst-case} version (when $x1,\dots,xs$ may be any strings in ${0,1}n$), in which the sample complexity of the most efficient known algorithm \cite{BCFSS19} is doubly exponential in $s$.

Citations (20)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube