Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 56 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 39 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 155 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 476 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Optimal Space-Depth Trade-Off of CNOT Circuits in Quantum Logic Synthesis (1907.05087v3)

Published 11 Jul 2019 in quant-ph, cs.CC, and cs.DS

Abstract: Decoherence -- in the current physical implementations of quantum computers -- makes depth reduction a vital task in quantum-circuit design. Moore and Nilsson (SIAM Journal of Computing, 2001) demonstrated that additional qubits -- known as ancillae -- can be used to provide an extended space to parallelize quantum circuits. Specifically, they proved that, with $O(n2)$ ancillae, any $n$-qubit CNOT circuit can be transformed into an equivalent one of $O(\log n)$ depth. However, the near-term quantum technologies can only support a limited amount of qubits, making space-depth trade-off a fundamental research subject for quantum-circuit synthesis. In this work, we establish an asymptotically optimal space-depth trade-off for CNOT circuits. We prove that any $n$-qubit CNOT circuit can be parallelized to $$O\left(\max\left{\log n, \frac{n2}{(n+m)\log (n+m)}\right}\right)$$ depth with $m$ ancillae. This bound is tight even if the task is expanded from exact synthesis to the approximation of CNOT circuits with arbitrary two-qubit quantum gates. Our result can be extended to stabilizer circuits via the reduction by Aaronson and Gottesman (Physical Review A, 2004). Furthermore, we provide hardness evidence for optimizing CNOT circuits in terms of size or depth. Our result has improved upon two previous papers that motivated our work. Moore-Nilsson's construction (aforementioned) for $O(\log n)$-depth CNOT circuit synthesis: We have reduced their need for ancillae by a factor of $\log2 n$ by showing that $m= O(n2/\log2 n)$ additional qubits -- which is asymptotically optimal -- suffice to build equivalent $O(\log n)$-depth $O(n2/\log n)$-size CNOT circuits. Patel-Markov-Hayes's construction (Quantum Information & Computation 2008) for $m = 0$: We have reduced their depth by a factor of $n$ and achieved the asymptotically optimal bound of $O(n/\log n)$.

Citations (35)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.