Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 64 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 185 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 442 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Approximate multiplication of nearly sparse matrices with decay in a fully recursive distributed task-based parallel framework (1906.08148v7)

Published 19 Jun 2019 in math.NA, cs.DC, and cs.NA

Abstract: In this paper we consider parallel implementations of approximate multiplication of large matrices with exponential decay of elements. Such matrices arise in computations related to electronic structure calculations and some other fields of computational science. Commonly, sparsity is introduced by dropping out small entries (truncation) of input matrices. Another approach, the sparse approximate multiplication algorithm [M. Challacombe and N. Bock, arXiv preprint 1011.3534, 2010] performs truncation of sub-matrix products. We consider these two methods and their combination, i.e. truncation of both input matrices and sub-matrix products. Implementations done using the Chunks and Tasks programming model and library [E. H. Rubensson and E. Rudberg, Parallel Comput., 40:328-343, 2014] are presented and discussed. We show that the absolute error in the Frobenius norm behaves as $O\left(n{1/2} \right), n \longrightarrow \infty $ and $O\left(\tau{p/2} \right), \tau \longrightarrow 0,\,\, \forall p < 2$ for all three methods, where $n$ is the matrix size and $\tau$ is the truncation threshold. We compare the methods on a model problem and show that the combined method outperforms the original two. The methods are also applied to matrices coming from large chemical systems with $\sim 106$ atoms. We show that the combination of the two methods achieves better weak scaling by reducing the amount of communication by a factor of $\approx 2$.

Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.