Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Efficiently Sampling and Estimating from Substructures using Linear Algebraic Queries (1906.07398v2)

Published 18 Jun 2019 in cs.CC

Abstract: Given an unknown $n \times n$ matrix $A$ having non-negative entries, the \emph{inner product} (IP) oracle takes as inputs a specified row (or a column) of $A$ and a vector $v \in \mathbb{R}{n}$, and returns their inner product. A derivative of IP is the induced degree query in an unknown graph $G=(V(G), E(G))$ that takes a vertex $u \in V(G)$ and a subset $S \subseteq V(G)$ as input and reports the number of neighbors of $u$ that are present in $S$. The goal of this paper is to understand the strength of the inner product oracle. Our results in that direction are as follows: (I) IP oracle can solve bilinear form estimation, i.e., estimate the value of ${\bf x}{T}A\bf{y}$ given two vectors ${\bf x},\, {\bf y} \in \mathbb{R}{n}$ with non-negative entries and can sample almost uniformly entries of a matrix with non-negative entries; (ii) We tackle for the first time weighted edge estimation and weighted sampling of edges that follow as an application to the bilinear form estimation and almost uniform sampling problems, respectively; (iii) induced degree query, a derivative of IP can solve edge estimation and an almost uniform edge sampling in induced subgraphs. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first set of Oracle-based query complexity results for induced subgraphs. We show that IP/induced degree queries over the whole graph can simulate local queries in any induced subgraph; (iv) Apart from the above, we also show that IP can solve several problems related to matrix, like testing if the matrix is diagonal, symmetric, doubly stochastic, etc.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Arijit Bishnu (23 papers)
  2. Arijit Ghosh (50 papers)
  3. Gopinath Mishra (32 papers)
  4. Manaswi Paraashar (16 papers)
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.