Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Meta-Learning via Learned Loss (1906.05374v4)

Published 12 Jun 2019 in cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.RO, and stat.ML

Abstract: Typically, loss functions, regularization mechanisms and other important aspects of training parametric models are chosen heuristically from a limited set of options. In this paper, we take the first step towards automating this process, with the view of producing models which train faster and more robustly. Concretely, we present a meta-learning method for learning parametric loss functions that can generalize across different tasks and model architectures. We develop a pipeline for meta-training such loss functions, targeted at maximizing the performance of the model trained under them. The loss landscape produced by our learned losses significantly improves upon the original task-specific losses in both supervised and reinforcement learning tasks. Furthermore, we show that our meta-learning framework is flexible enough to incorporate additional information at meta-train time. This information shapes the learned loss function such that the environment does not need to provide this information during meta-test time. We make our code available at https://sites.google.com/view/mlthree.

Citations (109)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a meta-learning framework, ML³, that automatically learns a parametric loss function to guide model optimization across various tasks.
  • It employs nested optimization loops where the inner loop trains the model using the learned loss and the outer loop refines the loss function based on task performance.
  • Experiments show that the learned meta-loss improves convergence speed and robustness in complex optimization settings, benefiting both supervised and reinforcement learning scenarios.

Meta-Learning via Learned Loss

"Meta-Learning via Learned Loss" explores a framework that automates the learning of loss functions intended to optimize models over multiple tasks. This framework, referred to as ML3^3, leverages meta-learning to develop parametric loss functions that generalize across various tasks and architectures. The proposed methodology attempts to optimize models more efficiently by using learned loss signals rather than traditional hand-crafted losses.

Learning Framework and Approach

The core idea of the paper is to learn a parametric loss function, or meta-loss, which generalizes across training contexts or tasks and assists in optimizing the parameters of another model, referred to as the optimizee. The framework consists of nested optimization loops:

  1. Inner Loop: It trains the model (optimizee) using gradient descent with the learned meta-loss as the gradient signal.
  2. Outer Loop: It refines the parameters of the meta-loss by utilizing a task-specific loss that assesses the performance of the optimizee trained in the inner loop.

The paper demonstrates that these learned loss functions can better shape the loss landscapes when compared to task-specific losses, enhancing convergence speed and robustness across diverse tasks. The framework is adaptable enough to include additional guidance during meta-training, like expert demonstrations or exploratory signals for RL tasks, which do not need to be supplied during meta-testing. Figure 1

Figure 1: Framework overview: The learned meta-loss is used as a learning signal to optimize the optimizee fθf_\theta, which can be a regressor, a classifier, or a control policy.

Implementation in Supervised and Reinforcement Learning

The framework is applied to both supervised learning and reinforcement learning (RL) scenarios.

Supervised Learning

In supervised settings, the task is to learn a loss function Mϕ\mathcal{M}_\phi for regression and classification problems. The aim is to encode strategies into a single meta-loss that is more effective than the ground truth or task-specific losses alone. The methodology enables efficient optimization through improved loss landscapes. Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Meta-learning for regression (top) and binary classification (bottom) tasks. (a) meta-train task, (b) meta-test tasks, (c) performance of the meta-network on the meta-train task as a function of (outer) meta-train iterations in blue, as compared to SGD using the task-loss directly in orange, (d) average performance of meta-loss on meta-test tasks as a function of the number of gradient update steps.

Reinforcement Learning

For RL, the meta-loss framework adapts to model-free and model-based paradigms, illustrated through tasks such as ReacherGoal and AntGoal environments. In these contexts, the meta-loss effectively guides policy learning, yet retains generality to work across diverse challenges encountered at test time.

Model-based Reinforcement Learning: Integration with a dynamics model allows for effective policy optimization in simulators, requiring the learned model's predictions only during meta-train time, simplifying test-time requirements.

Model-free Reinforcement Learning: Enhancement of sample efficiency by leveraging the meta-loss to facilitate task learning, reducing the reliance on computationally heavy methods like PPO during test phases.

Experiments and Evaluations

The experiments demonstrate that learned meta-loss functions can surpass standard task losses in terms of training efficiency and final performance. The authors provide results indicating significant improvements in model training speed and flexibility across various domains, including regression, classification, model-based, and model-free reinforcement learning scenarios.

Shaping Loss Landscapes

By strategically incorporating additional information at meta-train time, the paper illustrates improvements in the convergence of non-convex problems, evident in applications like inverse dynamics learning in robot arms where using a shaped meta-loss resulted in higher sample efficiency.

The framework's flexibility in integrating supplementary information allows it to exploit expert demonstrations for enhanced learning from demonstrations, yielding improved task generalization capability without the need to present such information during testing phases.

Conclusion

The paper presents a generic framework that advances the efficiency of training paradigms by automating the learning of adaptable, generalizable loss functions. It emphasizes the potential of ML3^3 to address bottlenecks in traditional model training methods, opening avenues for exploration and application across numerous machine learning fields such as robotics and AI-driven control systems. Future undertakings might investigate adaptive combinations of multiple learned loss functions, fostering broader applicability and capability in addressing complex real-world tasks.

Whiteboard

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.