Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 45 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 11 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 88 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 214 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 460 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Strong equivalence for $\rm LP^{MLN}$ programs (1905.07550v1)

Published 18 May 2019 in cs.LO

Abstract: Strong equivalence is a well-studied and important concept in answer set programming (ASP). $\rm LP{MLN}$ is a probabilistic extension of answer set programs with the weight scheme adapted from Markov Logic. Because of the semantic differences, strong equivalence for ASP does not simply carry over to $\rm LP{MLN}$. I study the concept of strong equivalence in $\rm LP{MLN}$ with the goal of extending strong equivalence to $\rm LP{MLN}$ programs. My study shows that the verification of strong equivalence in $\rm LP{MLN}$ can be reduced to equivalence checking in classical logic plus weight consideration.The result allows us to leverage an answer set solver for checking strong equivalence in $\rm LP{MLN}$. Furthermore, this study also suggests us a few reformulations of the $\rm LP{MLN}$ semantics using choice rules, logic of here and there, and the second-order logic. I will present my work result of strong equivalence for $\rm LP{MLN}$ and talk about my next steps for research: one is approximately strong equivalence, and another is the integration of fuzzy logic with neural network.

Citations (3)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)