Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 39 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 91 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 191 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 456 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A Stochastic Gradient Method with Biased Estimation for Faster Nonconvex Optimization (1905.05185v1)

Published 13 May 2019 in cs.LG, math.OC, and stat.ML

Abstract: A number of optimization approaches have been proposed for optimizing nonconvex objectives (e.g. deep learning models), such as batch gradient descent, stochastic gradient descent and stochastic variance reduced gradient descent. Theory shows these optimization methods can converge by using an unbiased gradient estimator. However, in practice biased gradient estimation can allow more efficient convergence to the vicinity since an unbiased approach is computationally more expensive. To produce fast convergence there are two trade-offs of these optimization strategies which are between stochastic/batch, and between biased/unbiased. This paper proposes an integrated approach which can control the nature of the stochastic element in the optimizer and can balance the trade-off of estimator between the biased and unbiased by using a hyper-parameter. It is shown theoretically and experimentally that this hyper-parameter can be configured to provide an effective balance to improve the convergence rate.

Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)