Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
GPT-5.1
GPT-5.1 91 tok/s
Gemini 3.0 Pro 55 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Flash 173 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 194 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Improved Distributed Expander Decomposition and Nearly Optimal Triangle Enumeration (1904.08037v2)

Published 17 Apr 2019 in cs.DS and cs.DC

Abstract: An $(\epsilon,\phi)$-expander decomposition of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a clustering of the vertices $V=V_{1}\cup\cdots\cup V_{x}$ such that (1) each cluster $V_{i}$ induces subgraph with conductance at least $\phi$, and (2) the number of inter-cluster edges is at most $\epsilon|E|$. In this paper, we give an improved distributed expander decomposition. Specifically, we construct an $(\epsilon,\phi)$-expander decomposition with $\phi=(\epsilon/\log n){2{O(k)}}$ in $O(n{2/k}\cdot\text{poly}(1/\phi,\log n))$ rounds for any $\epsilon\in(0,1)$ and positive integer $k$. For example, a $(0.01,1/\text{poly}\log n)$-expander decomposition can be computed in $O(n{\gamma})$ rounds, for any arbitrarily small constant $\gamma>0$. Previously, the algorithm by Chang, Pettie, and Zhang can construct a $(1/6,1/\text{poly}\log n)$-expander decomposition using $\tilde{O}(n{1-\delta})$ rounds for any $\delta>0$, with a caveat that the algorithm is allowed to throw away a set of edges into an extra part which forms a subgraph with arboricity at most $n{\delta}$. Our algorithm does not have this caveat. By slightly modifying the distributed algorithm for routing on expanders by Ghaffari, Kuhn and Su [PODC'17], we obtain a triangle enumeration algorithm using $\tilde{O}(n{1/3})$ rounds. This matches the lower bound by Izumi and Le Gall [PODC'17] and Pandurangan, Robinson and Scquizzato [SPAA'18] of $\tilde{\Omega}(n{1/3})$ which holds even in the CONGESTED CLIQUE model. This provides the first non-trivial example for a distributed problem that has essentially the same complexity (up to a polylogarithmic factor) in both CONGEST and CONGESTED CLIQUE. The key technique in our proof is the first distributed approximation algorithm for finding a low conductance cut that is as balanced as possible. Previous distributed sparse cut algorithms do not have this nearly most balanced guarantee.

Citations (48)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.