Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 177 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 119 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 202 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 432 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Coded trace reconstruction (1903.09992v6)

Published 24 Mar 2019 in cs.IT, math.CO, and math.IT

Abstract: Motivated by average-case trace reconstruction and coding for portable DNA-based storage systems, we initiate the study of \emph{coded trace reconstruction}, the design and analysis of high-rate efficiently encodable codes that can be efficiently decoded with high probability from few reads (also called \emph{traces}) corrupted by edit errors. Codes used in current portable DNA-based storage systems with nanopore sequencers are largely based on heuristics, and have no provable robustness or performance guarantees even for an error model with i.i.d.\ deletions and constant deletion probability. Our work is a first step towards the design of efficient codes with provable guarantees for such systems. We consider a constant rate of i.i.d.\ deletions, and perform an analysis of marker-based code-constructions. This gives rise to codes with redundancy $O(n/\log n)$ (resp.\ $O(n/\log\log n)$) that can be efficiently reconstructed from $\exp(O(\log{2/3}n))$ (resp.\ $\exp(O(\log\log n){2/3})$) traces, where $n$ is the message length. Then, we give a construction of a code with $O(\log n)$ bits of redundancy that can be efficiently reconstructed from $\textrm{poly}(n)$ traces if the deletion probability is small enough. Finally, we show how to combine both approaches, giving rise to an efficient code with $O(n/\log n)$ bits of redundancy which can be reconstructed from $\textrm{poly}(\log n)$ traces for a small constant deletion probability.

Citations (79)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.