Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 71 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 124 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 200 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 463 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A sub-quadratic algorithm for the longest common increasing subsequence problem (1902.06864v3)

Published 19 Feb 2019 in cs.DS

Abstract: The Longest Common Increasing Subsequence problem (LCIS) is a natural variant of the celebrated Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) problem. For LCIS, as well as for LCS, there is an $O(n2)$-time algorithm and a SETH-based conditional lower bound of $O(n{2-\varepsilon})$. For LCS, there is also the Masek-Paterson $O(n2 / \log{n})$-time algorithm, which does not seem to adapt to LCIS in any obvious way. Hence, a natural question arises: does any (slightly) sub-quadratic algorithm exist for the Longest Common Increasing Subsequence problem? We answer this question positively, presenting a $O(n2 / \loga{n})$-time algorithm for $a = \frac{1}{6}-o(1)$. The algorithm is not based on memorizing small chunks of data (often used for logarithmic speedups, including the "Four Russians Trick" in LCS), but rather utilizes a new technique, bounding the number of significant symbol matches between the two sequences.

Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.