Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 43 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 96 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 197 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 455 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A structure theorem for almost low-degree functions on the slice (1901.08839v1)

Published 25 Jan 2019 in math.CO and cs.DM

Abstract: The Fourier-Walsh expansion of a Boolean function $f \colon {0,1}n \rightarrow {0,1}$ is its unique representation as a multilinear polynomial. The Kindler-Safra theorem (2002) asserts that if in the expansion of $f$, the total weight on coefficients beyond degree $k$ is very small, then $f$ can be approximated by a Boolean-valued function depending on at most $O(2k)$ variables. In this paper we prove a similar theorem for Boolean functions whose domain is the `slice' ${{[n]}\choose{pn}} = {x \in {0,1}n\colon \sum_i x_i = pn}$, where $0 \ll p \ll 1$, with respect to their unique representation as harmonic multilinear polynomials. We show that if in the representation of $f\colon {{[n]}\choose{pn}} \rightarrow {0,1}$, the total weight beyond degree $k$ is at most $\epsilon$, where $\epsilon = \min(p, 1-p){O(k)}$, then $f$ can be $O(\epsilon)$-approximated by a degree-$k$ Boolean function on the slice, which in turn depends on $O(2{k})$ coordinates. This proves a conjecture of Filmus, Kindler, Mossel, and Wimmer (2015). Our proof relies on hypercontractivity, along with a novel kind of a shifting procedure. In addition, we show that the approximation rate in the Kindler-Safra theorem can be improved from $\epsilon + \exp(O(k)) \epsilon{1/4}$ to $\epsilon+\epsilon2 (2\ln(1/\epsilon))k/k!$, which is tight in terms of the dependence on $\epsilon$ and misses at most a factor of $2{O(k)}$ in the lower-order term.

Citations (11)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.