Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

A structure theorem for almost low-degree functions on the slice

Published 25 Jan 2019 in math.CO and cs.DM | (1901.08839v1)

Abstract: The Fourier-Walsh expansion of a Boolean function f ⁣:0,1<sup>n</sup>0,1f \colon {0,1}<sup>n</sup> \rightarrow {0,1} is its unique representation as a multilinear polynomial. The Kindler-Safra theorem (2002) asserts that if in the expansion of ff, the total weight on coefficients beyond degree kk is very small, then ff can be approximated by a Boolean-valued function depending on at most O(2<sup>k)O(2<sup>k) variables. In this paper we prove a similar theorem for Boolean functions whose domain is the `slice' ([n]pn)=x0,1<sup>n ⁣:</sup>ixi=pn{{[n]}\choose{pn}} = {x \in {0,1}<sup>n\colon</sup> \sum_i x_i = pn}, where 0p10 \ll p \ll 1, with respect to their unique representation as harmonic multilinear polynomials. We show that if in the representation of f ⁣:([n]pn)0,1f\colon {{[n]}\choose{pn}} \rightarrow {0,1}, the total weight beyond degree kk is at most ϵ\epsilon, where ϵ=min(p,1p)<sup>O(k)\epsilon = \min(p, 1-p)<sup>{O(k)}, then ff can be O(ϵ)O(\epsilon)-approximated by a degree-kk Boolean function on the slice, which in turn depends on O(2<sup>k)O(2<sup>{k}) coordinates. This proves a conjecture of Filmus, Kindler, Mossel, and Wimmer (2015). Our proof relies on hypercontractivity, along with a novel kind of a shifting procedure. In addition, we show that the approximation rate in the Kindler-Safra theorem can be improved from ϵ+exp(O(k))ϵ<sup>1/4\epsilon + \exp(O(k)) \epsilon<sup>{1/4} to ϵ+ϵ<sup>2</sup>(2ln(1/ϵ))<sup>k/k!\epsilon+\epsilon<sup>2</sup> (2\ln(1/\epsilon))<sup>k/k!, which is tight in terms of the dependence on ϵ\epsilon and misses at most a factor of 2<sup>O(k)2<sup>{O(k)} in the lower-order term.

Authors (2)
Citations (11)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.