Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

PAC Identification of Many Good Arms in Stochastic Multi-Armed Bandits

Published 24 Jan 2019 in cs.LG and stat.ML | (1901.08386v1)

Abstract: We consider the problem of identifying any kk out of the best mm arms in an nn-armed stochastic multi-armed bandit. Framed in the PAC setting, this particular problem generalises both the problem of best subset selection' and that of selectingone out of the best m' arms [arcsk 2017]. In applications such as crowd-sourcing and drug-designing, identifying a single good solution is often not sufficient. Moreover, finding the best subset might be hard due to the presence of many indistinguishably close solutions. Our generalisation of identifying exactly kk arms out of the best mm, where 1km1 \leq k \leq m, serves as a more effective alternative. We present a lower bound on the worst-case sample complexity for general kk, and a fully sequential PAC algorithm, \GLUCB, which is more sample-efficient on easy instances. Also, extending our analysis to infinite-armed bandits, we present a PAC algorithm that is independent of nn, which identifies an arm from the best ρ\rho fraction of arms using at most an additive poly-log number of samples than compared to the lower bound, thereby improving over [arcsk 2017] and [Aziz+AKA:2018]. The problem of identifying $k > 1$ distinct arms from the best ρ\rho fraction is not always well-defined; for a special class of this problem, we present lower and upper bounds. Finally, through a reduction, we establish a relation between upper bounds for the one out of the best ρ\rho' problem for infinite instances and theone out of the best mm' problem for finite instances. We conjecture that it is more efficient to solve `small' finite instances using the latter formulation, rather than going through the former.

Citations (22)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.