Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 150 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 34 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 113 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 211 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 444 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

PAC Identification of Many Good Arms in Stochastic Multi-Armed Bandits (1901.08386v1)

Published 24 Jan 2019 in cs.LG and stat.ML

Abstract: We consider the problem of identifying any $k$ out of the best $m$ arms in an $n$-armed stochastic multi-armed bandit. Framed in the PAC setting, this particular problem generalises both the problem of best subset selection' and that of selectingone out of the best m' arms [arcsk 2017]. In applications such as crowd-sourcing and drug-designing, identifying a single good solution is often not sufficient. Moreover, finding the best subset might be hard due to the presence of many indistinguishably close solutions. Our generalisation of identifying exactly $k$ arms out of the best $m$, where $1 \leq k \leq m$, serves as a more effective alternative. We present a lower bound on the worst-case sample complexity for general $k$, and a fully sequential PAC algorithm, \GLUCB, which is more sample-efficient on easy instances. Also, extending our analysis to infinite-armed bandits, we present a PAC algorithm that is independent of $n$, which identifies an arm from the best $\rho$ fraction of arms using at most an additive poly-log number of samples than compared to the lower bound, thereby improving over [arcsk 2017] and [Aziz+AKA:2018]. The problem of identifying $k > 1$ distinct arms from the best $\rho$ fraction is not always well-defined; for a special class of this problem, we present lower and upper bounds. Finally, through a reduction, we establish a relation between upper bounds for the one out of the best $\rho$' problem for infinite instances and theone out of the best $m$' problem for finite instances. We conjecture that it is more efficient to solve `small' finite instances using the latter formulation, rather than going through the former.

Citations (22)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.