Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 37 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 90 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 179 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Efficiently Approximating Edit Distance Between Pseudorandom Strings (1811.04300v1)

Published 10 Nov 2018 in cs.DS

Abstract: We present an algorithm for approximating the edit distance $\operatorname{ed}(x, y)$ between two strings $x$ and $y$ in time parameterized by the degree to which one of the strings $x$ satisfies a natural pseudorandomness property. The pseudorandomness model is asymmetric in that no requirements are placed on the second string $y$, which may be constructed by an adversary with full knowledge of $x$. We say that $x$ is \emph{$(p, B)$-pseudorandom} if all pairs $a$ and $b$ of disjoint $B$-letter substrings of $x$ satisfy $\operatorname{ed}(a, b) \ge pB$. Given parameters $p$ and $B$, our algorithm computes the edit distance between a $(p, B)$-pseudorandom string $x$ and an arbitrary string $y$ within a factor of $O(1/p)$ in time $\tilde{O}(nB)$, with high probability. Our algorithm is robust in the sense that it can handle a small portion of $x$ being adversarial (i.e., not satisfying the pseudorandomness property). In this case, the algorithm incurs an additive approximation error proportional to the fraction of $x$ which behaves maliciously. The asymmetry of our pseudorandomness model has particular appeal for the case where $x$ is a \emph{source string}, meaning that $\operatorname{ed}(x, y)$ will be computed for many strings $y$. Suppose that one wishes to achieve an $O(\alpha)$-approximation for each $\operatorname{ed}(x, y)$ computation, and that $B$ is the smallest block-size for which the string $x$ is $(1/\alpha, B)$-pseudorandom. We show that without knowing $B$ beforehand, $x$ may be preprocessed in time $\tilde{O}(n{1.5}\sqrt{B})$, so that all future computations of the form $\operatorname{ed}(x, y)$ may be $O(\alpha)$-approximated in time $\tilde{O}(nB)$. Furthermore, for the special case where only a single $\operatorname{ed}(x, y)$ computation will be performed, we show how to achieve an $O(\alpha)$-approximation in time $\tilde{O}(n{4/3}B{2/3})$.

Citations (12)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)