Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Optimal terminal dimensionality reduction in Euclidean space

Published 22 Oct 2018 in cs.DS, math.FA, and stat.ML | (1810.09250v1)

Abstract: Let ε(0,1)\varepsilon\in(0,1) and XR<sup>dX\subset\mathbb R<sup>d be arbitrary with X|X| having size $n&gt;1$. The Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma states there exists f:XR<sup>mf:X\rightarrow\mathbb R<sup>m with m=O(ε<sup>2log</sup>n)m = O(\varepsilon<sup>{-2}\log</sup> n) such that xX yX,xy2f(x)f(y)2(1+ε)xy2. \forall x\in X\ \forall y\in X, |x-y|_2 \le |f(x)-f(y)|_2 \le (1+\varepsilon)|x-y|_2 . We show that a strictly stronger version of this statement holds, answering one of the main open questions of [MMMR18]: "yX\forall y\in X" in the above statement may be replaced with "yR<sup>d\forall y\in\mathbb R<sup>d", so that ff not only preserves distances within XX, but also distances to XX from the rest of space. Previously this stronger version was only known with the worse bound m=O(ε<sup>4log</sup>n)m = O(\varepsilon<sup>{-4}\log</sup> n). Our proof is via a tighter analysis of (a specific instantiation of) the embedding recipe of [MMMR18].

Authors (2)
Citations (47)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.