Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 62 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 93 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 213 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 458 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Quantum adiabatic optimization without heuristics (1810.04686v2)

Published 10 Oct 2018 in quant-ph and cs.DS

Abstract: Quantum adiabatic optimization (QAO) is performed using a time-dependent Hamiltonian $H(s)$ with spectral gap $\gamma(s)$. Assuming the existence of an oracle $\Gamma$ such that $\gamma_\min = \Theta\left(\min_s\Gamma(s)\right)$, we provide an algorithm that reliably performs QAO in time $O\left(\gamma_\min{-1}\right)$ with $O\left(\log(\gamma_\min{-1})\right)$ oracle queries, where $\gamma_\min = \min_s \gamma(s)$. Our strategy is not heuristic and does not require guessing time parameters or annealing paths. Rather, our algorithm naturally produces an annealing path such that $|dH/ds| \approx \gamma(s)$ and chooses its own runtime to be as close as possible to optimal while promising convergence to the ground state. We then demonstrate the feasibility of this approach in practice by explicitly constructing a gap oracle $\Gamma$ for the problem of finding the minimum point $m = \mathrm{argmin}u W(u)$ of the cost function $W:\mathcal{V}\longrightarrow [0,1]$, restricting ourselves to computational basis measurements and driving Hamiltonian $H(0)=I - |\mathcal{V}|{-1}\sum{u,v \in \mathcal{V}}\vert{u}\rangle\langle{v}\vert$. Requiring only that $W$ have a constant lower bound on its spectral gap and upper bound $\kappa$ on its spectral ratio, our QAO algorithm returns $m$ with probability $(1-\epsilon)(1-e{-1/\epsilon})$ in time $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon{-1}[\sqrt{|\mathcal{V}|} + (\kappa-1){2/3}|\mathcal{V}|{2/3}])$. This achieves a quantum advantage for all $\kappa$, and recovers Grover scaling up to logarithmic factors when $\kappa \approx 1$. We implement the algorithm as a subroutine in an optimization procedure that produces $m$ with exponentially small failure probability and expected runtime $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon{-1}[\sqrt{|\mathcal{V}|} + (\kappa-1){2/3}|\mathcal{V}|{2/3}])$ even when $\kappa$ is not known beforehand.

Citations (12)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.