Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 49 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 172 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Flexible Mixture Modeling on Constrained Spaces (1809.09238v2)

Published 24 Sep 2018 in stat.CO and stat.ML

Abstract: This paper addresses challenges in flexibly modeling multimodal data that lie on constrained spaces. Such data are commonly found in spatial applications, such as climatology and criminology, where measurements are restricted to a geographical area. Other settings include domains where unsuitable recordings are discarded, such as flow-cytometry measurements. A simple approach to modeling such data is through the use of mixture models, especially nonparametric mixture models. Mixture models, while flexible and theoretically well-understood, are unsuitable for settings involving complicated constraints, leading to difficulties in specifying the component distributions and in evaluating normalization constants. Bayesian inference over the parameters of these models results in posterior distributions that are doubly-intractable. We address this problem via an algorithm based on rejection sampling and data augmentation. We view samples from a truncated distribution as outcomes of a rejection sampling scheme, where proposals are made from a simple mixture model and are rejected if they violate the constraints. Our scheme proceeds by imputing the rejected samples given mixture parameters and then resampling parameters given all samples. We study two modeling approaches: mixtures of truncated Gaussians and truncated mixtures of Gaussians, along with their associated Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling algorithms. We also discuss variations of the models, as well as approximations to improve mixing, reduce computational cost, and lower variance. We present results on simulated data and apply our algorithms to two problems; one involving flow-cytometry data, and the other, crime recorded in the city of Chicago.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.