Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 49 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 172 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A Simple Elementary Proof of P=NP based on the Relational Model of E. F. Codd (1809.04519v4)

Published 12 Sep 2018 in cs.CC

Abstract: The P versus NP problem is studied under the relational model of E. F. Codd. I found that the term "complete configuration" is unnecessary and harmful in computational complexity theory because of excessive symbol redundancy. For an input, its valid sequences of complete configurations are normalized into a relational model of shared trichoices with no redundancy. To simplify the problem, a polynomial time nondeterministic Turing machine is polynomially reduced to a periodic machine, which only reverses its tape head displacement at the tape ends. By enumerating all the O(p(n)) shared trichoices, a polynomial time p(n) periodic machine is simulated in time O((p(n))4) under logarithmic cost. A simple elementary proof of P=NP is obtained.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)