Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 48 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 205 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 473 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Connected greedy coloring $H$-free graphs (1807.09034v1)

Published 24 Jul 2018 in math.CO and cs.DM

Abstract: A connected ordering $(v_1, v_2, \ldots, v_n)$ of $V(G)$ is an ordering of the vertices such that $v_i$ has at least one neighbour in ${v_1, \ldots, v_{i - 1}}$ for every $i \in {2, \ldots, n}$. A connected greedy coloring (CGC for short) is a coloring obtained by applying the greedy algorithm to a connected ordering. This has been first introduced in 1989 by Hertz and de Werra, but still very little is known about this problem. An interesting aspect is that, contrary to the traditional greedy coloring, it is not always true that a graph has a connected ordering that produces an optimal coloring; this motivates the definition of the connected chromatic number of $G$, which is the smallest value $\chi_c(G)$ such that there exists a CGC of $G$ with $\chi_c(G)$ colors. An even more interesting fact is that $\chi_c(G) \le \chi(G)+1$ for every graph $G$ (Benevides et. al. 2014). In this paper, in the light of the dichotomy for the coloring problem restricted to $H$-free graphs given by Kr\'al et.al. in 2001, we are interested in investigating the problems of, given an $H$-free graph $G$: (1). deciding whether $\chi_c(G)=\chi(G)$; and (2). given also a positive integer $k$, deciding whether $\chi_c(G)\le k$. We have proved that Problem (2) has the same dichotomy as the coloring problem (i.e., it is polynomial when $H$ is an induced subgraph of $P_4$ or of $P_3+K_1$, and it is NP-complete otherwise). As for Problem (1), we have proved that $\chi_c(G) = \chi(G)$ always hold when $G$ is an induced subgraph of $P_5$ or of $P_4+K_1$, and that it is NP-hard to decide whether $\chi_c(G)=\chi(G)$ when $H$ is not a linear forest or contains an induced $P_9$. We mention that some of the results actually involve fixed $k$ and fixed $\chi(G)$.

Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.