Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 126 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 45 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 127 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 183 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 425 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Derandomizing the Lovasz Local Lemma via log-space statistical tests (1807.06672v2)

Published 17 Jul 2018 in cs.DS

Abstract: The Lov\'{a}sz Local Lemma (LLL) is a keystone principle in probability theory, guaranteeing the existence of configurations which avoid a collection $\mathcal B$ of "bad" events which are mostly independent and have low probability. In its simplest form, it asserts that whenever a bad-event has probability $p$ and affects at most $d$ other bad-events, and $e p (d+1) < 1$, then a configuration avoiding all $\mathcal B$ exists. A seminal algorithm of Moser & Tardos (2010) gives randomized algorithms for most constructions based on the LLL. However, deterministic algorithms have lagged behind. Notably, prior deterministic LLL algorithms have required stringent conditions on $\mathcal B$; for example, they have required that events in $\mathcal B$ have low decision-tree complexity or depend on a small number of variables. For this reason, they can only be applied to small fraction of the numerous LLL applications in practice. We describe an alternate deterministic parallel (NC) algorithm for the LLL, based on a general derandomization method of Sivakumar (2002) using log-space statistical tests. The only requirement here is that bad-events should be computable via a finite automaton with $\text{poly}(d)$ states. This covers most LLL applications to graph theory and combinatorics. No auxiliary information about the bad-events, including any conditional probability calculations, are required. Additionally, the proof is a straightforward combination of general derandomization results and high-level analysis of the Moser-Tardos algorithm. We illustrate with applications to defective vertex coloring, domatic partition, and independent transversals.

Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.