Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 37 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 10 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 84 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 448 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 31 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

On maximum $k$-edge-colorable subgraphs of bipartite graphs (1807.06556v1)

Published 17 Jul 2018 in cs.DM and math.CO

Abstract: If $k\geq 0$, then a $k$-edge-coloring of a graph $G$ is an assignment of colors to edges of $G$ from the set of $k$ colors, so that adjacent edges receive different colors. A $k$-edge-colorable subgraph of $G$ is maximum if it is the largest among all $k$-edge-colorable subgraphs of $G$. For a graph $G$ and $k\geq 0$, let $\nu_{k}(G)$ be the number of edges of a maximum $k$-edge-colorable subgraph of $G$. In 2010 Mkrtchyan et al. proved that if $G$ is a cubic graph, then $\nu_2(G)\leq \frac{|V|+2\nu_3(G)}{4}$. This result implies that if the cubic graph $G$ contains a perfect matching, in particular when it is bridgeless, then $\nu_2(G)\leq \frac{\nu_1(G)+\nu_3(G)}{2}$. One may wonder whether there are other interesting graph-classes, where a relation between $\nu_2(G)$ and $\frac{\nu_1(G)+\nu_3(G)}{2}$ can be proved. Related with this question, in this paper we show that $\nu_{k}(G) \geq \frac{\nu_{k-i}(G) + \nu_{k+i}(G)}{2}$ for any bipartite graph $G$, $k\geq 0$ and $i=0,1,...,k$.

Citations (7)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.