Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
98 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
8 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Positive Aging Admits Fast Asynchronous Plurality Consensus (1806.02596v2)

Published 7 Jun 2018 in cs.DC

Abstract: We study distributed plurality consensus among $n$ nodes, each of which initially holds one of $k$ opinions. The goal is to eventually agree on the initially dominant opinion. We consider an asynchronous communication model in which each node is equipped with a random clock. Whenever the clock of a node ticks, it may open communication channels to a constant number of other nodes, chosen uniformly at random or from a list of constantly many addresses acquired in previous steps. The tick rates and the delays for establishing communication channels (channel delays) follow some probability distribution. Once a channel is established, communication between nodes can be performed instantaneously. We consider distributions for the waiting times between ticks and channel delays that have constant mean and the so-called positive aging property. In this setting, asynchronous plurality consensus is fast: if the initial bias between the largest and second largest opinion is at least $\sqrt{n}\log n$, then after $O(\log\log_\alpha k\cdot\log k+\log\log n)$ time all but a $1/ \text{polylog } n$ fraction of nodes have the initial plurality opinion. Here $\alpha$ denotes the initial ratio between the largest and second largest opinion. After additional $O(\log n)$ steps all nodes have the same opinion w.h.p., and this result is tight. If additionally the distributions satisfy a certain density property, which is common in many well-known distributions, we show that consensus is reached in $O(\log \log_\alpha k + \log \log n)$ time for all but $n/\text{polylog } n$ nodes, w.h.p. This implies that for a large range of initial configurations partial consensus can be reached significantly faster in this asynchronous communication model than in the synchronous setting.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.