Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 48 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 205 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 473 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Joint Size and Depth Optimization of Sorting Networks (1806.00305v1)

Published 1 Jun 2018 in cs.DS

Abstract: Sorting networks are oblivious sorting algorithms with many interesting theoretical properties and practical applications. One of the related classical challenges is the search of optimal networks respect to size (number of comparators) of depth (number of layers). However, up to our knowledge, the joint size-depth optimality of small sorting networks has not been addressed before. This paper presents size-depth optimality results for networks up to $12$ channels. Our results show that there are sorting networks for $n\leq9$ inputs that are optimal in both size and depth, but this is not the case for $10$ and $12$ channels. For $n=10$ inputs, we were able to proof that optimal-depth optimal sorting networks with $7$ layers require $31$ comparators while optimal-size networks with $29$ comparators need $8$ layers. For $n=11$ inputs we show that networks with $8$ or $9$ layers require at least $35$ comparators (the best known upper bound for the minimal size). And for networks with $n=12$ inputs and $8$ layers we need $40$ comparators, while for $9$ layers the best known size is $39$.

Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)