Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 28 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 197 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 471 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Intelligent Trainer for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning (1805.09496v6)

Published 24 May 2018 in cs.LG, cs.AI, and stat.ML

Abstract: Model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) has been proposed as a promising alternative solution to tackle the high sampling cost challenge in the canonical reinforcement learning (RL), by leveraging a learned model to generate synthesized data for policy training purpose. The MBRL framework, nevertheless, is inherently limited by the convoluted process of jointly learning control policy and configuring hyper-parameters (e.g., global/local models, real and synthesized data, etc). The training process could be tedious and prohibitively costly. In this research, we propose an "reinforcement on reinforcement" (RoR) architecture to decompose the convoluted tasks into two layers of reinforcement learning. The inner layer is the canonical model-based RL training process environment (TPE), which learns the control policy for the underlying system and exposes interfaces to access states, actions and rewards. The outer layer presents an RL agent, called as AI trainer, to learn an optimal hyper-parameter configuration for the inner TPE. This decomposition approach provides a desirable flexibility to implement different trainer designs, called as "train the trainer". In our research, we propose and optimize two alternative trainer designs: 1) a uni-head trainer and 2) a multi-head trainer. Our proposed RoR framework is evaluated for five tasks in the OpenAI gym (i.e., Pendulum, Mountain Car, Reacher, Half Cheetah and Swimmer). Compared to three other baseline algorithms, our proposed Train-the-Trainer algorithm has a competitive performance in auto-tuning capability, with upto 56% expected sampling cost saving without knowing the best parameter setting in advance. The proposed trainer framework can be easily extended to other cases in which the hyper-parameter tuning is costly.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.